The end of traditional roles: analyst, architect, and tester in the world of GENESIS-AI (AI by design)

In autonomous software development, such as GENESIS-AI, the classic roles of analyst, architect, and tester are largely disappearing. The platform talks to the business, turns that conversation into specifications, designs the application, generates code and tests, so the operational part of their work is taken over by the system. In the AI by design model, the process is built from the outset so that AI does most of the work, and people define the rules, boundaries, and meanings—they design the factory, not individual projects.

What really disappears

In the traditional approach:

• The analyst collects requirements, writes them down in MS Word/Jira, and organizes the backlog.

• The architect designs the system structure, integrations, data models, and draws diagrams.

• The tester prepares scenarios, clicks regression, writes automated scripts.

In the world of GENESIS-AI:

• The set of requirements is the result of Genesis BisStory's work with the business team, not the manual work of an analyst.

• The architecture, integrations, and data models are created from a structured specification, not from UML drawings.

• Tests are generated and run automatically in Genesis QA based on requirements and the system model, so manually repeating scenarios no longer makes sense.

These tasks do not disappear – they are simply performed by a software factory rather than individual people.

Today vs. tomorrow: how roles are changing

Analyst → domain curator

Today

• Talks to the business, writes down requirements, clarifies contradictions and gaps.

Tomorrow

• Indicates directions for how GENESIS-AI should talk to the business in a given domain: what questions the agent should ask, what scenarios it must go through, what concepts to use.

• Defines a glossary of terms, response structure, completeness rules – what needs to be clarified before the specification is "ready for generation."

Instead of producing more documents, the "tomorrow" analyst directs the language and conversation pattern between the business and the software factory – their domain knowledge goes into prompts, templates, and rules that are used repeatedly, not just once.

Architect → ecosystem designer and guardrails

Today

• Designs a single application: its modules, integrations, data models, technology selection.

Tomorrow

• Defines rules for the entire factory: standards for modules, integrations, security, logging, and monitoring.

• Builds repository templates, model components, standard adapters, and rules that GENESIS-AI uses when generating multiple applications.

The architect no longer draws individual diagrams – he designs meta-architecture, i.e., guardrails and patterns that determine what systems the factory can generate. His decisions live in templates, pipelines, and policies, not just in documentation.

Tester/QA → factory quality owner

Today

• Writes tests, clicks regression, reports defects.

Tomorrow

• Defines quality metrics

Testers don't "test applications"; they configure the quality system: test standards, automatic checks, rules for responding to deviations. Tests are a product of the process, and the role of humans is to ensure that they cover real business, regulatory, and technical risks.

The philosophy of AI by design: factory instead of handicraft

AI by design assumes that from day one, we design the manufacturing process on the assumption that AI is the main contractor and humans are the factory designers.

• Requirements are created as structural artifacts that are immediately suitable for code generation, testing, and configuration.

• The architecture is modular, based on clearly defined contracts and adapters, so that agents can autonomously generate and modify components.

• Quality and security are built into the pipeline—metrics, tests, and controls are standard, not an "option" at the end.

Instead of ad hoc "sticking AI" to the classic process (AI-ready), the process is built from scratch to work with GENESIS-AI – otherwise, the system will start bypassing manual bottlenecks anyway.

Why tomorrow is economically better

• The operational work of analysts, architects, and testers is transferred to the pipeline, so the unit cost of the project decreases – rules and patterns are designed once and used in many initiatives.

• The repetition of the same decisions and artifacts in each project (e.g., integration standard with the same system, the same login pattern, a similar set of critical tests) is eliminated.

The result: fewer man-hours of "manual" work per project and a higher share of fixed costs (factory), which are amortized across the entire system portfolio.

Why tomorrow gives better product quality

• Architecture, requirements, testing, and security standards are encoded in the factory, so quality does not depend on "which team you get" for a given project.

• Each implementation feeds the factory with experience: defects, incidents, and failure patterns are incorporated into rules, patterns, and tests, so that a single fix can protect dozens of subsequent systems.

Instead of "heroes" saving individual projects, a repeatable system is created that is designed to produce better solutions.

Why tomorrow is faster

• Classic hand-offs (business → analyst → architect → dev → QA) are disappearing: GENESIS-AI drives a continuous flow from conversation to working application, and people step in where a decision or correction is needed.

• Prototyping (UI, flows, API) is part of the same factory – what the business sees as a prototype can be developed for production without rewriting the whole thing.

Time-to-value is shortened: the business gets a working version faster, and iterations are cheaper because the operational cost of maintaining them is mainly borne by the system.

Why tomorrow is better at keeping up with change

• A change in requirements is primarily a change in the model/specification, not a series of meetings and manual rework – GENESIS-AI generates a new version of the application based on the updated description.

• Domain curators and ecosystem designers operate at the pattern level: when the regulation or logic of a domain changes, they update the rules and structures, rather than each system individually. ​

The organization responds to changes in weeks, not years, because it modifies the factory, not dozens of independent projects.

What this means for people

• Careers based on simple operational activities will quickly disappear – these tasks will be taken over by GENESIS-AI.

• There is a real opportunity to move up to meta roles that design rules, patterns, metrics, and how to talk to the business across the organization.

GENESIS-AI does not "help analysts, architects, and testers do the same thing faster." It replaces their operational work and leaves people space to design how the entire software factory should operate – which is why tomorrow is both more demanding and much better than today.