2026 – time for GENESIS-AI
- Mariusz Maleszak
- Jan 1
- 3 min read
The Age of AI Agents
Not long ago, language models worked like a very talkative calculator: fast, sometimes brilliant, but easy to confuse when the task became large. They could write a good code snippet, yet a full software product (architecture, integrations, tests, deployment) still needed a human to steer every step. In 2025, something shifted. The biggest tech companies started talking less about “assistants” and more about agents – AI systems that can plan, use tools, and complete multi-step work. Microsoft said it directly: “We’ve entered the era of AI agents.” This is not just a slogan. It’s a signal: “this is real, we ship products around it.”
What is an “AI agent”, in plain words?
An AI agent is not just “a smarter chatbot”. It is a model + an action loop + tools. An agent:
gets a goal (for example: “build a login module”),
makes a plan,
executes steps using tools (code repository, terminal, tests, documents),
checks results and fixes errors.
Anthropic describes it very clearly: “A multi-agent system consists of multiple agents (LLMs autonomously using tools in a loop) working together.” In practice, this can automate work that usually needs a team:

Figure 1 Theoretical Workflow in the Agentic AI Environment
“The Agent Era” from the biggest players
What used to be experiments became named, packaged, and measured in 2025. Google Cloud writes it openly: “The agentic era is here” and adds: “This is a new era, and the public sector is helping lead it.” In the data space, Google says: “The agentic era is here… join us… to redefine what’s possible with data.”
OpenAI also pushes agents into real production work. In the AgentKit announcement: “Today we’re launching AgentKit… to build, deploy, and optimize agents.” The point is simple: less manual glue code, more ready-made building blocks for orchestration and quality checks.
Microsoft shows the same direction from a developer ecosystem angle and gives scale numbers: “more than 230,000 organizations – including 90% of the Fortune 500 – have already used Copilot Studio to build AI agents and automations.” This is not a discussion about “hype”. This is real adoption.
Agents that write code (and handle more than one file)
The biggest, most visible change is in software development. We moved from “code suggestions” to “task delegation”.
Google describes agent mode in Gemini Code Assist as a kind of AI pair programmer that can plan and execute larger work across many files: “agent mode acts as an AI pair programmer… plan and execute complex, multi-file tasks.”
OpenAI goes even further into “agentic coding”. In their Polish-language announcement of GPT‑5.2‑Codex, they say: “Today, we're releasing GPT-5.2-Codex – the most advanced agent-based programming model... for complex software development.“ Even if you read Polish version and you don’t speak Polish, the meaning is clear: the model is presented as an agentic coding model for complex software building.
Microsoft highlights a similar trend in GitHub: “asynchronous coding agent integrated into the GitHub platform.” That means an agent can work “in the background”, while humans focus on review and approval.
Why many agents beat one “super model”
For projects like GENESIS-AI, the key question is not “can the model write a function?”, but “can the system keep the whole solution consistent?” Multi-agent architecture helps here:
a “requirements” agent keeps the spec and acceptance criteria,
an “architect” agent protects structure and standards,
a “developer” agent writes code,
a “tester” agent runs tests and finds regressions,
a “security” agent checks common risks,
a “reviewer” agent checks readability and quality.
This is like a strong engineering team, but parallel, faster, and always available (which is impressive – and a little existential).
In 2025, research also started to organize this area. One survey says: “The emergence of LLM-based agents represents a paradigm shift in AI…” and explains that agents combine planning, tools, and memory.
This matters because the “agent era” is not only marketing. It also includes better evaluation methods: ways to test if agents are reliable and predictable.
What does this mean for GENESIS-AI?
From the start, GENESIS-AI was designed as a shift in how software is built: not “AI helps a developer”, but “an AI system builds an application” from a specification and quality rules.

Figure 2 Reality Before the Age of AI Agents
Before agents, you had to force one model to do everything: prompt → answer → fix → prompt again… With agents, you can build it like a factory:
an orchestrator agent breaks the goal into tasks,
specialized agents work in parallel,
control agents test, evaluate, and detect conflicts,
a human approves key decisions and the result.
A simple, high-level diagram looks like this:

Figure 3 A high-level theoretical example of an agentic AI system
This is the core idea of the agent era: AI does not only “talk”. It acts – in a controlled, measurable, and increasingly repeatable way.





Comments